Legal Opinion

Bergen v. Frisbie

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1899No. Sac. No. 572PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court 'of Shasta County and from an order denying a new trial. Edward Sweeney, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. •

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Defendant Frisbie had certain matters pertaining to timber land entries made by him pending before the secretary of the interior at Washington. He had paid two thousand and fifty dollars to the government upon these entries, and was desirous of the issuance of the patents to him for the land. These matters had been long delayed in the land department, whereupon defendant entered into a contract with plaintiffs, whereby he engaged their services as attorneys for the purpose of having the said entries ratified and declared valid; and *169if such ratification and confirmation could not be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Hoffman v. VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Noble v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Smyth Bros.-McCleary-McClellan Co. v. BeresfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Crawford v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Bush v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Hall v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API