Miller's v. Shannon
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
SIMS, Judge.
The question for decision is whether or not the signature of testatrix appears at the end or close of a writing purporting to be her holographic will, as required by KRS 394.040, 446.060. The paper was probated without any contest in the Jefferson County Court, but on appeal to the Jefferson Circuit Court the trial judge in a well considered opinion held the paper was not duly executed, hence not the will of testatrix. This appeal followed.
The record shows no contrariety in the facts and a photostatic copy of the will, as well as of the envelope in which it was found, are in the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re the Estate of ManchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Succession of BeirdSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Warwick v. WarwickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
- Alexander v. . JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Fosselman v. ElderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kretz EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Smith v. NeikirkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
- Matter of Estate of FegleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
- Thompson v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2000
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.