Legal Opinion

McNeill v. Daniel

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1932No. 8589Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The occupancy by the grantee in a deed of land upon which there is timber, though such occupancy be open, notorious, and in good faith, and though the occupancy has been continuous for such length of time as required by law to give the grantee a good prescriptive title to the land, does not conclude a prior lessee of the timber upon the land under a lease executed by the predecessor in title of the grantee and duly recorded. Such occupancy by the grantee in the deed is consistent with, and is not as matter of law adverse to, the possession of the prior lessee. That being true, no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moore v. Ensign-Oscamp Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API