Legal Opinion

Morozin v. Hausmaninger

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 8397PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

In this action which was instituted April 13, 1948, plaintiff seeks judgment against the defendant, his landlady, under Section 205 of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942,1 as amended, for treble damages for alleged overcharges of rent. The total amount claimed is $631.50, plus a reasonable attorney’s fee and costs.

The details of -the claim as alleged in the complaint are as follows:

The defendant has moved to dismiss the action on- the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction because the amount in controversy is less than $3,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs. .

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Farmers Nat. Bank of Lebanon, Ky.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  2. Fields v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ramseyer v. ContestabileDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Schuman v. GreenbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
  3. Burns v. BishopDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1950
  4. Frisch v. LopezDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Landes v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API