Clothier v. Sigle

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fort, J.

The plaintiffs sue the defendant for necessaries furnished to his wife.

That articles of wearing apparel and the like were furnished to her by the plaintiffs on her order, and that they were such as were suitable for one in her st.atiop in life, was proven.

The defence was that the defendant was not living with his wife at the time the articles were purchased, but that they *420were living in a state of separation, without his fault, and that the plaintiffs knew of that fact.

Where a wife is living separate and apart from her husband as a result of…