Legal Opinion

Texas & New Orleans Railway Co. v. Conroy

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1892No. 3091PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLABD, Judge,

Section A.—Suit by appellee, Dennie Conroy, against appellant, the Texas & New Orleans Railway Company, for damages for injuries received by him, an employe of the railway, at Beaumont, Texas, while coupling a tender and engine to a freight train. The ground of the complaint was, that the coupling apparatus on the tender of the engine had as one of its attachments what is known as the “goose-neck;” that its use was more dangerous than the ordinary coupling apparatus, and was not intended to be used on freight trains; that plaintiff did not know it was there, and did not see it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. SomersTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. G., H. & S. A. R'y Co. v. LempeTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BrentfordTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Ry. Co. v. GarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway & International & Great Northern Railway v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Mayo v. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Wintermute v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Armour Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API