Legal Opinion

State v. Yos

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 21, 1984No. M399197; CA A31764PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Defendant was charged with reckless driving. ORS 487.550.1 The state appeals an order entered before trial dismissing the charging instrument because (1) defendant had entered into a civil compromise with the person whose auto he had struck and (2) dismissal would be “in furtherance of justice.” ORS 138.060(1). We affirm.

The court erred in dismissing the case “in furtherance of justice,” apparently pursuant to ORS 135.7552 (although the court did not specifically comply with that statute). The court’s rationale was that the “victim” would not appear to testify. There is no basis in this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DumondOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. DuffyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DuggerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API