Legal Opinion

Maddox v. Gude & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1925No. 6 Div. 390PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The sole question presented is: Does the right of the dependent wife of a deceased employee to compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, cease upon her being adjudged insane and becoming an inmate of the state hospital for the insane, subsequent to the death of the husband?

“For the purposes of this chapter, the following described persons shall be conclusively presumed to be wholly dependent:
“(a) Wife, unless it be known that she was voluntarily living apart from her husband at the time of his injury or death or unless it be shown that she was not married to the deceased at the time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. WhaleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Ex Parte Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Ex Parte ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Baxter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Briggs v. Tennessee Coal, Iron R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API