Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Moonbug Entertainment Limited v. Babybus (Fujian) Network Technology Co., Ltd

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 6, 2024No. 3:21-cv-06536Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MOONBUG ENTERTAINMENT Case No. 21-cv-06536-EMC LIMITED, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 9 MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND v. MOTION TO AMEND/CORRECT 10 JUDGMENT TO INCLUDE PRE- BABYBUS (FUJIAN) NETWORK JUDGMENT INEREST, ORDER 11 TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD, et al., DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ASSIGNMENT 12 Defendants. 13 Docket Nos. 630, 646, 682 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Plaintiffs are Moonbug Entertainment Limited and Treasure Studio, Inc. (collectively, 17 “Moonbug”). Defendants are Babbu Co., Ltd. and…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API