Legal Opinion

Lingle v. Clemens

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1861PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit, for work and labor in building a house. The defendant answered, as to $600 of the demand sued for, that the work was done under a special parol contract, *125by which, it was to be paid for, to the amount of $600, by the conveyance by the defendant to the plaintiff, of one of two designated lots in Lafayette, (giving their numbers,) the title to which was then in Godlove S. Orth, Esq., but which defendant was to procure and convey to plaintiffs when the work should be done, on the plaintiffs’ signifying •to him which one of the two lots he should procure and convey, they having the option;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hadden v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Johnson v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1823

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dubois County MacHine Company v. BlessingerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API