Legal Opinion
Dennis D. Borgeson and Bonnie L. Borgeson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 18, 1985No. 84-1938PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Per curiam
This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting defendant’s motion to dismiss and for summary judgment in plaintiffs’ action for refund of taxes brought under 26 U.S.C. § 7422 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1340, and 1346(a)(1).
On April 15, 1983, plaintiffs filed their 1982 Form 1040 with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) seeking a refund of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alexander v. "Americans United" Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zellerbach Paper Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Lucas v. Pilliod Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated December 7 & 8, Issued to Stover v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Elon Kevan Rowlee, Ii, and the New York Patriots Society for Individual Liberty AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Donald W. Dawes and Phyllis C. DawesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States of America and Richard Kawabata, Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Ralph W. Schmidt and Reeda SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Allen W. Jolly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.