Legal Opinion
Rudnick v. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 21, 2008No. 64A03-0712-CV-559PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Steve Rudnick sued his employer, Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District (“the District”), under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”). The trial court granted summary judgment for the District because Rudnick did not substantially comply with the notice requirement of the Indiana Tort Claims Act. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On February 24, 2003, Rudnick was employed by the District as a conductor on a commuter train from South Bend, Indiana to Chicago, Illinois. On that date and during the course of his employment, Rud-nick slipped on some ice…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Collier v. PraterIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Indianapolis v. SatzIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Indiana Department of Public Welfare v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Oshinski v. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Judy Chang v. Purdue University, The Trustees of Purdue University Dr. France A. Cordova, President of Purdue University (in her official capacity)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Januchowski v. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Smithson v. HOWARD REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEMIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Lyons v. Richmond Community School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- TDM Farms, Inc. of North Carolina v. Wilhoite Family Farm, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.