Legal Opinion
Rodrigue v. Legros
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 8, 1989No. 88-805PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YELVERTON, Judge.
These cases are before us on appeals from two summary judgments rendered in third party actions. The main demand was an action for personal injury damages resulting from a collision between two vessels on White Lake on December 8, 1985. The summary judgments were rendered in contests over the interpretation of an indemnity clause in a contract between the defendant in the main demand and the defendants in the third party action. The personal injury case was settled, and what is before us now is who has to ultimately pay.
The background facts are as follows. The injured main…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Harvey Corbitt v. Diamond M. Drilling Co., Shell Oil Company, Third-Party v. Sladco, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Porphire Lanasse v. Travelers Insurance Company, the California Company, Defendant-Third Party v. Royal Insurance Company, Excess-Surplus Lines, Inc., And/or Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Joseph Robert Stoot v. Fluor Drilling Services, Inc. v. D & D Catering Service, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rodrigue v. LeGrosSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Rodrigue v. LegrosSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990