Legal Opinion

Buckley v. 112 Central Park South, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

This is a motion by the defendants 112 Central Park South, Inc., and Jerome Minskoff to stay the trial and all proceedings in this action on the part of the plaintiff because of a failure by the plaintiff to pay costs awarded Minskoff by orders of this court, the Appellate Division and the Court of Appeals, when judgment was directed and affirmed dismissing the complaint herein as against Minskoff. The trial is sought to be proceeded with by the plaintiff as against the corporate defendant.

Of course, the nonpayment of the costs would operate as a stay at Minskoff’s behest insofar as further…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shields v. Chilton Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. Tanzsheim v. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Associated Sales Analysts, Inc. v. WeitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. H. D. S. Mercantile Corp. v. Monet Fashions, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API