Legal Opinion · Dissent

Oregon v. Elstad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 4, 1985No. 83-773Published

1Dissent

Justice Brennan, with whom Justice Marshall joins,

dissenting.

The Self-Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment guarantees every individual that, if taken into official cus*319tody, he shall be informed of important constitutional rights and be given the opportunity knowingly and voluntarily to waive those rights before being interrogated about suspected wrongdoing. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966).1 This guarantee embodies our society’s conviction that “no system of criminal justice can, or should, survive if it comes to depend for its continued effectiveness on the citizens’…

2Cases cited109 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API