Legal Opinion

Ohio Merchants' Trust Co. v. Conrad

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERICK, PJ.

Sec 121, GC, provides: “No banker, broker, cashier, director, teller, or clerk of a bank, banker or broker, or other person holding an official relation to a bank, banker, or broker, shall be competent to act as notary public in any matter in which such bank, banker, or broker is interested.”

It therefore becomes apparent that it was necessary to determine whether or not the defendant bank was interested in the matter of the settlement of this estate. We believe that this question should be answered in the affirmative. It is plain and clear to us that, should the widow in this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bell v. HenryOhio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mead v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. In Re Trusteeship of Trust Created by Will of SedgwickOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Passoni v. BreehlTuscarawas County Probate Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API