Legal Opinion

Staley v. Illinois Threshermen's Mutual Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 31, 1927No. Gen. No. 8,080PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Shurtleff

delivered the opinion of the court.

The question in this case is raised as to the construction of section 32 of the Practice Act, Cahill’s St. ch. 110, ¶ 32, requiring plaintiff to file, with his declaration, copy of the instrument of writing on which the action is brought, ten days before the second term of court, or suffer judgment of dismissal, as in case of nonsuit. Appellant filed his suit in assumpsit to the September term, 1925, of the circuit court of McLean county, and summons was served and declaration filed more than ten days prior to that term. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Phenix Insurance v. StocksIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Gibbs v. Crane Elevator Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Waidner v. PaulyIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Pratt v. GrimesIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Moody v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boyda Dairy Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  2. Party Cab Co. ex rel. Hill v. Central Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  3. Ruedger v. ToledoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API