People Ex Rel. Craine v. Boyd
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Dissent
Mr. JUSTICE GEORGE J. MORAN,
dissenting:
The application of the mootness doctrine to this case and the majority’s refusal to remand the cause to the trial court with directions to dismiss the complaint reaches an unconscionable result — the defendant is bound by a finding that he was in need of mental treatment and has no possible means of reviewing that finding.
I do not believe the majority correctly applies the standard enunciated in In re Sciara, 21 Ill. App. 3d 889, 316 N.E.2d 153. While it is true that that court created a case-by-case approach in the application of the collateral…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re John Ballay, A/K/A Figeret Hoxha, PatientCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- People v. SciaraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Wheeler v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Pantlen v. GottschalkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- People v. StephensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.