Legal Opinion

A.M.K. v. E.D.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 1, 2002No. 2000712PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

A.M.K., the maternal grandmother (“the grandmother”), of K.D. and L.D., the children of E.D. and T.D, who is deceased, filed a complaint on July 14, 2000, seeking grandparent visitation pursuant to § 30-3-4.1, Ala.Code 1975. The grandmother alleged that she was very active in the lives of her minor grandchildren before her daughter’s (their mother’s) death and that since T.D.’s death her visitation with the minor children has been sporadic and limited. In her amended complaint filed on November 14, 2000, she alleges that she has no intention to hinder the parent/child…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. L.B.S. v. L.M.S.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. HEALTHSOUTH CORPORATION v. Brookwood Health Services, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. E.H.G. v. E.R.G.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  2. A.R.S. v. J.E.M.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Ex Parte ARSSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Fulghum Fibres, Inc. v. StokesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  5. State v. Redtop Market, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API