Legal Opinion
Robesena W. v. George B. D.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 29, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In a proceeding to establish paternity pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, George B. D. appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Friedman, J.), dated September 14, 1987, as, inter alla, confirmed the findings and recommendation set forth in the report of a Hearing Examiner and ordered him to make support payments in the amount of $100 a week and provide medical insurance for the child.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Pursuant to Family Court Act § 545, the respective means of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kay v. KayNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Hickland v. HicklandNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Creem v. CreemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Kathy G. J. v. Arnold D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Jeanne M. v. Richard G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ferlo v. FerloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Ciostek v. CiostekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Saltzman v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Mariana D. v. Frank D.New York City Family Court · 2008
- Zepperi v. MaderaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008