City of Miami v. Katz
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Judge.
The dispositive question is whether a trial court in the exercise of its discretion may deny a defendant’s motion to dismiss a complaint, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) for failure to prosecute, where a hearing on the motion is not scheduled until seven months after filing the motion and where, in the interim, the plaintiff has actively prosecuted the claim through completion of discovery and setting the case for trial. We hold that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss.
Rule 1.420(e) is not self-executing.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pollock v. PollackSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Equity Capital Co. v. 601 West 26 Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Fields v. FieldsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pennsylvania Blue Shield v. WolfeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Florida Bar v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Noughton v. HookerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006