Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Margiotta

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 13, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, Siegel, is a trustee in liquidation of the Lion Varnish Company, and is the successor of the appellee, Margiotta, who had been its trustee during an unsuccessful effort at- reorganization. On December 21, 1938, 'the judge made an allowance to Margiotta by an order which was served on Siegel on January 25, 1939, though it does not appear whether “proof of notice” was ever filed in the district court, as required by § 25a, 11 U.S.C.A. § 48 (a). On February 21, 1939, Siegel, wishing to appeal from the order, and supposing that he must get leave from this court, filed a proper…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. London v. O'DOUGHERTYCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Butts v. ClancyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. Matter Of The New Haven Clock & Watch CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
  3. First National Bank of Chicago v. O'KeefeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  4. Wilson v. Shamrock Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Raymond Wilson v. Shamrock Amusement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API