Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Griscom-Spencer Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided August 16, 1909No. 528PublishedCited by 3 opinions

At Raw. Sur rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of rlf*-fp-nc(a *

1Opinion of the Court

HORRAND, District Judge.

This suit for $2,120, with interest, is instituted in the name of the RTnited States, to the use of a subcontractor, under the Act of Congress approved August 13, 1894 (28 Stat. 278, c. 280 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2523]), to recover for material furnished in the construction of four mine planters for the United States army. It is alleged in the statement of claim that the Neafie & Revy Ship & Engine Building Company, of Philadelphia, undertook the building of four vessels for the United States army, by a contract dated June 24, 1903, for the sum of $122,000 each. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. The KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Segrist v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Harris v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1806

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Standard Salt & Cement Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Ohio River Gravel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  3. United States ex rel. Delaware Hardware Co. v. LynchDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API