State v. Banning
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.
— Defendant’s claim is that the district court did not have before it competent evidence to show that the judgment of conviction from which the principal defendant appealed, and because of which appeal the bond sued on was given, was affirmed, and the jurisdiction of this court terminated. The trial court had before it the procedendo from this court, showing affirmance; but defendant argues that procedendo is unknown to the statute, and that the only evidence on which the trial court may act in such cases is a certified copy of the decision and opinion of this court. Defendant relies on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hogle v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Becker v. BeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- State v. KnouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- State v. ClouserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- In the Interest of M.T., M.T., and T.B., Minor ChildrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Ronna v. American State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- State v. WaddellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- In Re MTSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006