Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stevenson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1978No. 358PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POMEROY, Justice.

Appellant Martin Stanshine, a lawyer, was adjudicated in contempt of court and sentenced to pay a fine of five hundred dollars. Because this case involves a direct criminal contempt in a court of common pleas, a direct appeal was brought here.1

Appellant represented George Stevenson, a defendant in a criminal case. The record discloses that the trial judge in this case frequently addressed the members of the jury panel as “good jurors” during his voir dire instructions. Part of these instructions dealt with the jurors’ duty to follow the law as determined by the court,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Thompson v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. In re DodsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Matter of CampolongoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. BryantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Moody, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API