Legal Opinion
In re: Dianette Hight
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 24, 2010No. 09-00779Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN In re: Case No. HG 09-00779 DIANETTE HIGHT, Chapter 13 Debtor. / OPINION RE: STATE OF MICHIGAN’S AUGUST 13, 2009 OBJECTION - DEBTOR’S PROTECTIVE PROOF OF CLAIM Appearances: Benjamin M. White, Esq., Grand Rapids, Michigan, attorney for Debtor Heather M.S. Durian, Asst. Attorney General, Lansing, Michigan, attorney for the State of Michigan Dianette Hight is a Chapter 13 debtor currently performing the terms of her confirmed plan. The State of Michigan (the “State”) has objected to Ms. Hight’s filing of a proof of claim on its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re James and Dianne Ripley, Debtors. United States of America v. James and Dianne RipleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Dukesherer Farms, Inc v. Director of the Department of AgricultureMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Abraham & Straus v. Francis (In Re Francis)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- RTO Rents v. Benson (In Re Benson)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.