Legal Opinion

Deas v. The Berkeley

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided November 18, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Admiralty. Libel by George Deas against the steam tug Berkeley for seaman’s wages. On motion to vacate a decree.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONTON, District Judge.

This is a motion to set aside a decree in admiralty. On 18th August, 1893, the libel was filed for seaman’s wages, and a warrant of arrest asked for. By the rule of this court, (rule 9,) process in rem may be issued without a mandate of the judge, except in foreign attachment or in suits for seaman’s wages. The judge was absent from Charleston, holding the court at Greenville, when this libel was filed. The clerk issued the warrant himself under the seal of the court, without the mandate of the judge. The marshal served the warrant, and arrested the vessel. In an hour…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Savas v. Maria Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  2. Criscuolo v. Atlas Imperial Diesel Engine Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  3. United States v. Marunaka Maru No. 88District Court, D. Alaska · 1983
  4. United States v. SoderbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  5. The Mount ShastaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API