Legal Opinion

Boyleston v. Southern Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 16, 1947No. 15997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FishburnE, J.:

This action was brought to recover damages for bodily injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff, L. A. Boyleston, while in the employment of the defendant, Southern Railway Company.

The plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a laborer at its freight station at Orangeburg, South Carolina. It was his duty to load and unload freight from boxcars passing through the defendant’s terminal at this point. In the usual conduct of the defendant’s business, two station laborers were employed, and plaintiff was one of them when he was injured. The evidence tends to show…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Morgan v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Langley v. BoyterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Berry v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  3. Berry v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API