Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Daschbach v. Meyers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1951No. 31735PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

— Relators ask for a writ of mandate against the respondents directing them to affix the true date of passage upon a bill, and true dates upon the proceedings of the legislature relative thereto.

It is relators’ contention that senate bill No. 379, now referred to as chapter 251 of the Session Laws of 1951, came before the Senate for final passage March 9,1951, which was the sixty-first day of the session, and that the records of the Senate erroneously show that such bill was passed March 8, 1951, and the records of both houses show that the bill was enrolled on that date, and that by such…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wells v. PurcellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Day v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State Ex Rel. Holmes v. ClawgesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Governor v. Nevada State LegislatureNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Eyman v. WymanWashington Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API