Legal Opinion

Autry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 2, 2007No. M-2005-7Published

1Opinion of the Court

172 P.3d 212 (2007)

2007 OK CR 41

David AUTRY, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. M-2005-7.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

November 2, 2007.

Mark Henricksen, Oklahoma City, OK, attorneys for defendant Autry at trial.

Pattye High, Assistant District Attorney, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma City, OK, attorney for state at trial.

Garvin A. Isaacs, Nancy A. Zerr, Oklahoma City, OK, attorneys for defendant/appellant Autry at trial and on appeal.

W.A. Drew Edmondson, Attorney General, Oklahoma, Seth S. Branham, Assistant Attorney General Oklahoma City, OK, attorneys for appellee on appeal.

Mic…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lumpkin; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lumpkin.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Kaiser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Zeigler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Autry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API