Legal Opinion

Hudson Trading Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 1, 1928No. 3719PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an amended interlocutory decree limiting libelant’s recovery to its pro rata share of the interest of the United States in the hull Aberfoil at the time the libel was filed, July 26, 1922.

Four libels were filed in the District Court, one by each of the following four libelants: The Hudson Trading Company, Inc., the Havana Central Railroad Company, Pedro Montardit y Maurie et ah, and Al-vara Crespo et al. Interlocutory deerees *745were entered in each case, and the cases were all consolidated, and by agreement only one appeal was taken to this court.

The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1896

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Calfornia Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
  2. United States v. M/V PITCAIRNDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
  3. Weir v. CorbettDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1957
  4. Everett Steamship Corp. v. Liberty Navigation & Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Everett Steamship Corporation, S/A v. Liberty Navigation And Trading Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API