Fisher v. May's Heirs
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION of the Court, by
Judge Logan.
— This :; is a suit in chancery, brought for the purpose of setting aside a contract entered into in October, 1782, between appe{jant aac| John May, relative to their claims under adversary titles to land.
If the parties «ndeitand the farts, ■*« — — of i.w ⅛*-⅛ faufe Taylor vs, Pa* U!,k> TOl- »» plated i, t.!i. tained through fraud or grofs and palpable millake, equity will relieve, aA^nvey-anee of i grm-'yorlefsquan-tity of lana than wa9 contera» A furplus of 22 acres in 400, is no evidence of fM0<i t or "miftake" and no ground <or. reIlet m tits Í70,
It…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Dodge v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Cumberland Falls Chair Lift, Inc. v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1976