Legal Opinion

Draffen v. City of Boonville

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1844PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from Cooper Circuit Court. 1. The law of this case is properly stated in the first, second, and third instructions on the part of the defendants, which were refused by the court.- — -8 Wend." Rep., 403, Seymour vs. Vanslick; Stone vs. Seymour and Buck, 15 Wend. Rep., 19; 3 Johns. Digest, 451, 452; 7 Cranch’s Rep., 572; same case, 2 Cond., 611; 1 How.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from Cooper Circuit Court. 1. The law of this case is properly stated in the first, second, and third instructions on the part of the defendants, which were refused by the court.- — -8 Wend." Rep., 403, Seymour vs. Vanslick; Stone vs. Seymour and Buck, 15 Wend. Rep., 19; 3 Johns. Digest, 451, 452; 7 Cranch’s Rep., 572; same case, 2 Cond., 611; 1 How. U. S. Rep., 250, United States vs. Eckford’s Executors. 2. In cases of bonds conditioned for the faithful discharge of duties for limited periods, the liabilities of sureties in such bonds cannot be extended beyond the period mentioned,…

1Opinion of the CourtNaeton, J.

This was an action of debt upon the official bond of Draffen, as collector of the revenue of the city of Boonville for the fiscal year 1810.

The bill of exceptions taken on the trial preserves the testimony and instructions of the court — upon which alone any question is presented.

*397The plaintiffs, it seems, were a corporation chartered by act of the legislature, with authority to levy and collect taxes for the support of the city, appoint collectors, and take bonds. The defendant, Draffen, was appointed collector for the fiscal year 1840, which fiscal year commenced on the 3d of May, 1840, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Seymour & Bouck v. Van SlyckNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  3. U. States v. January & PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1813

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Chatham National Bank v. FinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. State ex rel. Hickory County v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. State ex rel. Southern Bank v. AthertonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  4. Estes v. FrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. State ex rel. Pace v. McCormackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API