Smith v. Chapman
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
William Rogers Clay, Commissioner
Reversing.
In this action of trespass to try title- against the defendant, Will M. Smith, plaintiffs, Johnson Chapman and Rebecca Chapman, his wife, recovered a verdict and judgment for $700. Defendant appeals.
There have been two trials of the ease. On the first trial plaintiffs recovered a verdict and judgment for $650. During the progress of the action certain heirs of Hammond Goosling were made parties. On appeal to this court the judgment was affirmed. Goosling, et al. v. Chapman, et al., 147 Ky., 491, 144 S. W., 380. Subsequently,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Wilson v. StiversCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
- Goosling v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
3Cited by8 opinions
- Asher v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- H. F. Davis & Co. v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Bibb v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Britt v. HouserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Miller v. Cumberland Land Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.