Legal Opinion

Smith v. Chapman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 20, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Reversing.

In this action of trespass to try title- against the defendant, Will M. Smith, plaintiffs, Johnson Chapman and Rebecca Chapman, his wife, recovered a verdict and judgment for $700. Defendant appeals.

There have been two trials of the ease. On the first trial plaintiffs recovered a verdict and judgment for $650. During the progress of the action certain heirs of Hammond Goosling were made parties. On appeal to this court the judgment was affirmed. Goosling, et al. v. Chapman, et al., 147 Ky., 491, 144 S. W., 380. Subsequently,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Wilson v. StiversCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
  3. Goosling v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Asher v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. H. F. Davis & Co. v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Bibb v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Britt v. HouserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Miller v. Cumberland Land Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API