Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Trunnell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1881PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Mortgage. Vendor and Purchaser.' Estoppel. Husband and .Wife. Debtor and Creditor. Before Judge SIMMONS. Bibb Superior Court. April Term, 1881. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Chief Justice.

■ Suit was brought in the statutory form for the recovery of a lot of goods claimed by the plaintiff as having been converted by the defendant. The plaintiff is a married Woman, and the defendant bought the goods from the husband as agent of the wife. A mortgage had been previously given by the husband as agent, and signed also by the wife, to secure two promissory "notes, one for over $800.00 and the other ior $251.00, and when the bill of sale was executed these notes and the mortgage were delivered up to the husband. When the wife heard of the *519sale she repudiated it,…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harden v. LangSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. O'Callaghan v. Bank of EastmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. Berry v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Citizens Bank v. MullisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  5. Sparks & Hutson v. FortCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API