State v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
Jeremy Jackson appeals his convictions for first-degree murder committed for the benefit of a gang and attempted murder committed for the benefit of a gang. On appeal, Jackson argues that he is entitled to a new trial because of the State’s discovery violations and because of evidentiary errors. We affirm.
This action arises from the shooting death of Gennaro Knox and the shooting of T.K. The State charged Jackson in connection with the shootings and a grand jury subsequently indicted him on 12 counts.1 The State’s theory at trial was that Jackson shot the victims in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. GreenleafSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. DahlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HohenwaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. ZornesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. BoldmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. MorrowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. RadkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.