Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1971No. 8222Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSartain, Judge

I concur in that portion of the majority’s decision which affirms the trial judge’s ruling that Mrs. Arlene King Babineaux was in legal bad faith in her marriage to Mr. Cecyl Paul Babineaux and therefore not entitled to maintain a right of action under C.C. Art. 2315 for the death of Mr. Babi-neaux. However, I dissent from the majority’s decision which denies the oldest child, Paul Drake Babineaux, his right of action for his father’s death.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. Mr. and Mrs. Babineaux were married on April 25, 1960. At this time Mrs. Babi-neaux was still the legal wife of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Succession of NavarroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1872
  2. George v. BertrandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Miller v. WigginsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  4. Texas Company v. StewartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Jones v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of USLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API