Legal Opinion
Murray v. Crystex Composites LLC
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 28, 2009No. Civil Action 08-2672 (WHW)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, Senior District Judge.
Defendant Crystex Composites LLC moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The motion is granted.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This case originates from the purchase out of bankruptcy of a division of Spaulding Composites Company, Inc., Mykroy/Mycalix (“M & M”), that manufactured glass and ceramic electronic components. See Flores v. Murray, 2007 WL 3034512 (N.J.Super.App.Div.2007).
In 2001, Spaulding filed for bankruptcy in the District of New Hampshire and hired plaintiff John Murray as a consultant accountant to review M…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Mullarkey v. TamboerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Cogdell v. Hospital Center at OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- DiTrolio v. AntilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. RobnikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Healy v. FoxDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2021
- Jacqueline Smith v. Towd Point Mortgage TrustDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- Joseph Edward Florkevicz v. Ashley Kristen Curcio, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- LIN v. HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANKDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.