White v. . Mealio
New York Court of Appeals
This was an action to recover damages for an alleged wrongful entry upon plaintiff’s premises and interference with his business. The premises in question were leased by plaintiff of defendants. The lease contained a clause to the effect that the lessor would permit the lessees to enter the premises at reasonable hours in the day time to examine, or to make such repairs and alterations therein as should be necessary for the preservation of the building.
Read the full summary
This was an action to recover damages for an alleged wrongful entry upon plaintiff’s premises and interference with his business. The premises in question were leased by plaintiff of defendants. The lease contained a clause to the effect that the lessor would permit the lessees to enter the premises at reasonable hours in the day time to examine, or to make such repairs and alterations therein as should be necessary for the preservation of the building. The evidence tended to show that a contractor came upon the premises for the purpose of cutting holes through the walls to put in needles or…
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur j Folgee and Andbews, JJ., concurring in result.
Judgment reversed.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hesler v. ShaferNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Hessler v. SchaferNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- White v. ThurberNew York Supreme Court · 1890