Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover upon a life insurance policy, order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment affirmed, with ten doUars costs and disbursements. It is not disputed that the insured weU knew at the time he received the amount of the loan upon his poUey that the balance of the premium for the current policy year had not been deducted. He was not, therefore, misled, (del Rio v. Prudential Ins. Co., 269 N. Y. 135.) He further well knew, and was advised by the defendant’s agent, that, unless the quarterly premium due May 28, 1932, was paid, the policy would lapse and become…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rio v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roeser v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API