Legal Opinion
Michael A. Nadolski v. Merit Systems Protection Board, and United States Postal Service, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 27, 1997No. 95-3276PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Michael A Nadolski seeks review of the Merit Systems Protection Board’s final decision, Docket No. DC0752930658-I-1, 66 M.S.P.R. 525 (1995), dismissing as untimely the appeal of his allegedly involuntary retirement from the United States Postal Service and vacating the initial decision. We affirm.
Background
On August 7, 1992, the CEO and Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service announced an agency-wide reorganization. ’ At that time, Nadolski was a forty-four year old veteran and a Controller in the Northern Virginia Division of the Postal Service, where he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lauretta L. Mintzmyer v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Gary F. Mueller, Jerry E. Shechtman and Andrew T. Nulty v. United States Postal Service, and Merit Systems Protection Board, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Daniel R. Krizman v. Merit Systems Protection Board, and United States Postal Service, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- James B. King, Director, Office of Personnel Management v. Daino H. Jerome, and Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gonzalez v. Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022