Legal Opinion

Erickson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 12, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01801Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 JOHN ERICKSON et al., CASE NO. 2:23-cv-01801-LK 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUESTING 12 v. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING 13 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 17 (“Chase”) filed a motion to dismiss arguing, among other things, that Plaintiffs’ claims are barred 18 by collateral estoppel because Plaintiffs have raised the same issues in prior lawsuits and those 19 issues were resolved against Plaintiffs on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tarah Sahlberg v. P.S.C. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API