Legal Opinion

City of Pittsburgh v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 1986No. Appeal, No. 2619 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

This is an appeal by the City of Pittsburgh (Employer) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision granting temporary total disability benefits to Charles Schiller (Claimant). We reverse. .

Claimant was injured while employed as a rodent control worker by Employer. Claimant’s job required that he travel around the City of Pittsburgh in a van with his supervisor and a crew of four or five. coworkers. On May 14, 1981, Claimant was working his usual 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. shift. At approximately 4:00 p.m., his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Borough of Plum & Bituminous Casualty Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Harris v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Weaver v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hemmler v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. City of Harrisburg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. City of Pittsburgh v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Maurer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Montgomery County Sheriff's Department v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API