Estate of Myers v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
OppeR, Judge:
These facts, of course, are basically comparable to those in American Light & Traction Co., 42 B. T. A. 1121; affd. (C. C. A., 7th Cir.), 125 Fed. (2d) 365. There are, it is true, certain deviations, as respondent points out. In the present case petitioner’s change of position was not brought to respondent’s attention until the statute had run on the earlier year. And the amount of tax demanded of petitioner would be less if respondent succeeded in this proceeding than would have been due had the original transaction been viewed in what we now know to be the proper light.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- LeTulle v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ross v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Philadelphia Park Amusement Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Ticket Office Equipment Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Mellon. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. ScaifeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Pacific Public Service Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.