Legal Opinion

State v. Triplett

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1997No. 95-1708PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

We consider in this case whether the fifty-four-month delay between Triplett’s, indictment and trial constituted a violation of her Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. Because Triplett precipitated the delay by failing to claim certified mail informing her of her indictment, we find that the delay did not violate Triplett’s constitutional rights.

In United States v. MacDonald (1982), 456 U.S. 1, 8, 102 S.Ct. 1497, 1502, 71 L.Ed.2d 696, 704, the United States Supreme Court stated the purpose of the Sixth Amendment’s Speedy Trial Clause:

“The Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial is * * *…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. State v. OrrOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. AzbellOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State v. MizeOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. State v. RiceOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API