Legal Opinion

J. Francis Hock & Co. v. Strohm

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 30, 1934No. [No. 118, October Term, 1933.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Urner, J.,

delivered, the opinion of the -Court.

In a distribution by receivers of the Thomas A. Strohm Company, 3no., a dividend was allowed by the audit to the appellee on her claim for money advanced to the corporation in amounts aggregating $4,025. Exceptions by other creditors to that allowance were overruled, and the exceptants have appealed. ,

The appellee, Mrs, E. Florence Strohm, owns sixty-five shares of the company’s stock, while ten, shares, are Feld by Louis C. Praeger, its president, and four shares by Thomas A. Strohm, Jr., its secretary and treasurer. -There are no other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carozza v. Federal Finance & Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Baum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  3. James Pott & Co. v. SchmuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  4. Klecka v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  5. Folsom v. Detrick Fertilizer & Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hanson v. BradleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Clark's Material Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Obre v. Alban Tractor Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Ex Parte GareyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Schwaber v. HargestCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API