People v. Hicks
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of burglary in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 491-492 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that the defendant’s confession along with, inter alia, the DNA evidence recovered near the scene of the crime, was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Cartwright, 61…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. RamsundarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. RamsundarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. SidberryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. GroseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.