Legal Opinion

State v. Holkesvig

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2015No. 20140209, 20140210PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Randy Holkesvig appeals from a district court order denying his various postconviction motions in these criminal cases and from an order barring him from filing any further motions or pleadings at the district court level in these cases. We affirm the court’s order denying his motions because the district court did not abuse its discretion and because his appeal is frivolous. We affirm the separate order enjoining Holkesvig from further filings in these criminal cases, as modified to comport with N.D.C.C. ch. 29-32.1.

I

[¶ 2] In 2008, Holkesvig was charged with stalking,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Tarnavsky v. TarnavskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Everett v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Everett v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Gonzalez v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Gonzalez v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API