Hallock v. Teller
New York Surrogate's Court
Hearing of exceptions to referee’s report on administratrix’s accounting; filed in behalf of Daniel F. Hal-lock, and another, administrators of the estate of one of decedent’s next of kin. The facts appear sufficiently in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Surrogate.
This decedent died intestate in February, 1877: In May following, Ms daughter, Sarah A. Teller, was appointed administratrix of this estate. She filed an account in 1879, supplemented by another in 1880. In October, -1881, she filed still another, to which objections were interposed. The matter was thereupon sent to a referee, whose report is now before the court.
The referee allowed the administratrix, as principal and interest, the sum of $672.50 for board furnished the decedent, and for watching, nursing and attending him in his last illness. After the death of his wife, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. . HutchinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Kearney v. . McKeonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Robinson v. CushmanNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Dye v. KerrNew York Supreme Court · 1851
- Wilcox v. WilcoxNew York Supreme Court · 1867
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.