Legal Opinion

Warren v. Bearden

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 23, 1915No. 5791PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint; from city court of Madison — Judge Anderson. December 4, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.

1. It is not proper for a demurrer to allege facts which are not set forth in the petition which it seeks to attack; it thereby becomes speaking in character, and should be overruled. Clarke v. East Atlanta Land Co., 113 Ga. 21 (2), 26 (38 S. E. 323); Smith v. Ice Delivery Co., 8 Ga. App. 767 (4), 768 (70 S. E. 195). The court therefore did not err in overruling the demurrer in this ease.

2. Where suit is brought on a promissory note, which has been transferred to the plaintiff by the administrator of a deceased person, the defendant (the maker of the note), and also her husband acting as her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hendrick v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Castleberry v. ParrishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Clarke v. East Atlanta Land Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Gunn v. PettygrewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Smith v. Ice Delivery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ferris v. Union Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API