Warren v. Bearden
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Madison — Judge Anderson. December 4, 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.
1. It is not proper for a demurrer to allege facts which are not set forth in the petition which it seeks to attack; it thereby becomes speaking in character, and should be overruled. Clarke v. East Atlanta Land Co., 113 Ga. 21 (2), 26 (38 S. E. 323); Smith v. Ice Delivery Co., 8 Ga. App. 767 (4), 768 (70 S. E. 195). The court therefore did not err in overruling the demurrer in this ease.
2. Where suit is brought on a promissory note, which has been transferred to the plaintiff by the administrator of a deceased person, the defendant (the maker of the note), and also her husband acting as her…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hendrick v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Castleberry v. ParrishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Clarke v. East Atlanta Land Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Gunn v. PettygrewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Smith v. Ice Delivery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ferris v. Union Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932